4.7 Article

Design optimisation of perforated solar facades in order to balance daylighting with thermal performance

期刊

BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT
卷 125, 期 -, 页码 383-400

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.09.007

关键词

Daylight availability; Energy consumption; Optimal design; Orthogonal arrays; Perforated solar screens; Simulation tools

资金

  1. National Council of Science and Technology (CONACYT) of Mexico
  2. Institute of Architecture and Building Science (IUACC) of the University of Seville

向作者/读者索取更多资源

On fully-glazed building facades perforated solar screens (PSS) are often used as an outer skin in order to reduce energy consumption and to solve issues such as visual appearance. However, not only must PSS control solar radiation but they must also provide adequate daylight levels, thus requiring a balanced solution. Currently, daylighting simulation software enables us to perform efficient daylight analysis of spaces with PSS. Notwithstanding this, current energy simulation software such as EnergyPlus cannot deal well with such geometry directly, making the thermal evaluation of PSS an infeasible task. This paper presents a methodology for achieving an integrated analysis of daylighting and energy consumption of spaces with PSS during the design stage. Such methodology provides daylight analysis through DIVA, and thermal analysis through EnergyPlus via DIVA/Grasshopper/Archsim. The aim is to optimise the dual performance of a balanced PSS solution through controlling its perforation percentage, matrix and shape, by using the orthogonal arrays (DOA) statistical method. DOA method is efficient in reducing the number of simulations derived from the combination of the aforementioned Variables, and in identifying the optimal PSS configuration. In comparison to a non-optimised facade located in Seville, Spain, the predicted optimal PSS achieved a 50% increase in the actual daylit area and a 55% reduction in the total energy demand. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据