4.7 Article

Energy democracy: Goals and policy instruments for sociotechnical transitions

期刊

ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE
卷 33, 期 -, 页码 35-48

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.024

关键词

Energy democracy; Energy transition; Policy mix; Social movement

资金

  1. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
  2. Department of Natural Resource Sciences at McGill University
  3. University of Vermont
  4. College of Social Sciences and Humanities at Northeastern University
  5. Global Resilience Institute at Northeastern University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Energy democracy is an emergent social movement advancing renewable energy transitions by resisting the fossil-fuel-dominant energy agenda while reclaiming and democratically restructuring energy regimes. By integrating technological change with the potential for socioeconomic and political change, the movement links social justice and equity with energy innovation. Through a policy mix lens, this research examines the energy democracy agenda in the United States to understand how and to what extent the mix of policy instruments currently proposed among energy democracy advocates corresponds to the overarching goals of the movement. This assessment compares 22 policy instruments to 26 intended outcomes for energy democracy. The mix of policy instruments holds potential for advancing renewable energy transitions based on the combined goals of resist-reclaim-restructure, although current policies relate unevenly across the set of intended outcomes. Bolstering the energy democracy agenda will likely require developing new policies, strengthening existing policies, and integrating efforts to simultaneously resist dominant energy systems while also supporting their democratic and inclusive replacement. This research increases the visibility of the energy democracy movement and clarifies and assesses the core claims and policy instruments advanced by its advocates, contributing to policy design for renewable energy transitions and energy democracy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据