4.5 Article

Genetic diversity, population structure, and linkage disequilibrium of elite and local apple accessions from Belgium using the IRSC array

期刊

TREE GENETICS & GENOMES
卷 13, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11295-017-1206-0

关键词

Malus x domestica; SNP array; Parentage analysis; Tree architecture; Association study

资金

  1. IWT [IWT LO-080510]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The identification of molecular markers associated with economic and quality traits will help improve breeding for new apple (Malus x domestica Borkh.) cultivars. Tools such as the 8K apple SNP array developed by the RosBREED consortium allow for high-throughput genotyping of SNP polymorphisms within collections. However, genetic characterization and the identification of population stratification and kinship within germplasm collections is a fundamental prerequisite for identifying robust marker-trait associations. In this study, a collection of apple germplasm originally developed for plant architectural studies and consisting of both non-commercial/local and elite accessions was genotyped using the 8K apple SNP array to identify cryptic relationships between accessions, to analyze population structure and to calculate the linkage disequilibrium (LD). A total of nine pairs of synonyms and several triploids accessions were identified within the 130 accessions genotyped. In addition, most of the known parent-child relations were confirmed, and several putative, previously unknown parent-child relations were identified among the local accessions. No clear subgroups could be identified although some separation between local and elite accessions was evident. The study of LD showed a rapid decay in our collection, indicating that a larger number of SNPs is necessary to perform whole genome association mapping. Finally, an association mapping effort for architectural traits was carried out on a small number of accessions to estimate the feasibility of this approach.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据