4.5 Article

Adaptive Routing and Recharging Policies for Electric Vehicles

期刊

TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE
卷 51, 期 4, 页码 1326-1348

出版社

INFORMS
DOI: 10.1287/trsc.2016.0724

关键词

electric vehicles; adaptive routing; recharging policies; dynamic programming

资金

  1. Center for the Commercialization of Innovative Transportation Technology at Northwestern University
  2. University Transportation Center Program of the Research and Innovative Technology Administration of the United States Department of Transportation from the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act (SAFETEA-LU)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Planning a trip with an electric vehicle requires consideration of both battery dynamics and the availability of charging infrastructure. Recharging costs for an electric vehicle, which increase as the battery's charge level increases, are fundamentally different than refueling costs for conventional vehicles, which do not depend on the amount of fuel already in the tank. Furthermore, the viability of any route requiring recharging is sensitive to the availability of charging stations along the way. In this paper, we study the problem of finding an optimal adaptive routing and recharging policy for an electric vehicle in a network. Each node in the network represents a charging station and has an associated probability of being available at any point in time or occupied by another vehicle. We develop efficient algorithms for finding an optimal a priori routing and recharging policy and then present solution approaches to an adaptive problem that build on a priori policy. We present two heuristic methods for finding adaptive policies-one with adaptive recharging decisions only and another with both adaptive routing and recharging decisions. We then further enhance our solution approaches to a special case of the grid network. We conduct numerical experiments to demonstrate the empirical performance of our solutions and provide insights to our findings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据