4.5 Article

Mechanical coupling of microtubule-dependent motor teams during peroxisome transport in Drosophila S2 cells

期刊

BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-GENERAL SUBJECTS
卷 1861, 期 12, 页码 3178-3189

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2017.09.009

关键词

Single particle tracking; Molecular motors; Intracellular transport; Drosophila S2 cells

资金

  1. ANPCyT [PICT 2012-0899, PICT 2015-0370]
  2. UBA [UBACyT 20020150100122BA]
  3. CONICET [PIP 11220130100121CO]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Intracellular transport requires molecular motors that step along cytoskeletal filaments actively dragging cargoes through the crowded cytoplasm. Here, we explore the interplay of the opposed polarity motors kinesin-1 and cytoplasmic dynein during peroxisome transport along microtubules in Drosophila S2 cells. Methods: We used single particle tracking with nanometer accuracy and millisecond time resolution to extract quantitative information on the bidirectional motion of organelles. The transport performance was studied in cells expressing a slow chimeric plus-end directed motor or the kinesin heavy chain. We also analyzed the influence of peroxisomes membrane fluidity in methyl-beta-ciclodextrin treated cells. The experimental data was also confronted with numerical simulations of two well-established tug of war scenarios. Results and conclusions: The velocity distributions of retrograde and anterograde peroxisomes showed a multi modal pattern suggesting that multiple motor teams drive transport in either direction. The chimeric motors interfered with the performance of anterograde transport and also reduced the speed of the slowest retrograde team. In addition, increasing the fluidity of peroxisomes membrane decreased the speed of the slowest anterograde and retrograde teams. General significance: Our results support the existence of a crosstalk between opposed-polarity motor teams. Moreover, the slowest teams seem to mechanically communicate with each other through the membrane to trigger transport.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据