4.6 Article

Inhibition of T Cell Alloreactivity by Bronchial Epithelium Is Impaired in Lung Transplant Recipients, Through Pathways Involving TGF-, IL-10 and HLA-G

期刊

TRANSPLANTATION
卷 101, 期 9, 页码 2192-2199

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001553

关键词

-

资金

  1. Vaincre la Mucoviscidose
  2. Agence de la Biomedecine
  3. Legs Poix
  4. CARDIF assistance respiratoire

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) after lung transplantation (LTx) results from bronchial epithelial cell (BECs) damages, thought to be orchestrated by T cells primed by antigen-presenting cell presenting alloantigens. In this cell cross-talk, BECs are also suspected to play a pivotal immunosuppressive role in T cell alloreactivity. We studied the immunomodulating role of BECs in a human ex vivo model of allogeneic T cell response, both in healthy subjects and LTx recipients. Methods BECs from 35 LTx recipients (n = 22 stable, n = 13 BOS) and healthy controls (n = 25) were cultured as primary cell cultures. Their inhibitory capacities through the involvement of tolerogenic molecules (HLA-G, TGF-, and IL-10) were tested on a mixed lymphocyte reaction between antigen-presenting cells and recipient T cells. Results Control BECs inhibited T cell alloproliferation by a mean of 53 7%. This inhibitory effect of BECs was significantly reduced in the stable LTx group (24 +/- 8%, P = 0.009), but not in the BOS TxP group (53 +/- 10%, P = 0.97). Neutralization of HLA-G, TGF-, and IL-10 partially restored T cell alloproliferation, arguing for their involvement in the immunosuppressive effect of BECs. BECs culture supernatant from stable LTx patients with impaired BEC properties showed a skewed Th2-type secretion profile (high IL-4/IFN- ratio). Conclusions The inhibitory properties of BECs are dysregulated in stable LTx recipients, which could suggest their instrumental role in the initiation of BOS process and potential targeted therapies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据