4.6 Article

Reassessment of T Lymphocytes Crossmatches Results Prediction With Luminex Class I Single Antigen Flow Beads Assay

期刊

TRANSPLANTATION
卷 101, 期 3, 页码 624-630

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001239

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background In virtual crossmatch (XM) strategies, a correct anticipation of XM results is required for appropriately allocating organs. We reassessed the ability to predict T lymphocyte flow cytometry and complement dependent cytotoxicity XM results with the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) in Luminex class I single antigen flow beads (SAFB) assay, after correction of complement interference and exclusion of antidenatured HLA antibodies. Methods Among 432 XM with T lymphocytes (T-XM), 407 were analyzed after exclusion of antidenatured HLA antibodies. Only ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid-treated serum MFI was considered. Only 1 cellular target HLA antigen for the serum was expressed in 238 cases, 209 and 29 being heterozygous and homozygous for this antigen, respectively. For the remaining 169 cases, at least 2 antigens were recognized. Single antigen flow bead MFI thresholds allowing XM positivity to be predicted were calculated with receiver operating characteristic curves. Results T-XM results were tightly associated with SAFB MFI values. Anti-HLA-A and anti-HLA-B antibodies behaved similarly. Prediction and sensitivity SAFB MFI thresholds were determined, respectively, assessing the highest sensitivity/specificity ratio and at least 95% sensitivity for predicting T-XM positivity. Both were slightly lower for HLA-B than for HLA-A, whereas anti-HLA-Cw antibodies induced random XM results. Both thresholds were only slightly diminished for homozygous and for multiple HLA targets, considering the immunodominant, but not the sum, of antibodies MFI. Conclusions Antibodies against HLA-A, -B, or -Cw behave differently. A homozygous HLA target does not trigger a twice higher XM positivity. Multiple antibodies are better evaluated through the immunodominant DSA MFI than through the sum of DSA MFI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据