4.0 Review

Pathogen reduction of whole blood: utility and feasibility

期刊

TRANSFUSION MEDICINE
卷 27, 期 5, 页码 320-326

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/tme.12456

关键词

pathogen reduction; whole blood; developing countries; sub-Saharan Africa

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ObjectivesTo collect information on pathogen reduction applied to whole blood. BackgroundPathogen reduction (PR) of blood components has been developed over the past two decades, and pathogen-reduced fresh-frozen plasma and platelet concentrates are currently in clinical use. High cost and incomplete coverage of components make PR out of reach for low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). However, should PR become applicable to whole blood (WB), the main product transfused in sub-Saharan Africa, and be compatible with the preparation of clinically suitable components, cost would be minimised, and a range of safety measures in place at high cost in developed areas would become redundant. MethodsAll articles called with pathogen reduction, pathogen inactivation and whole blood were retrieved from Medline. References in articles were utilised. ResultsOne such PR technology (PRT) applied to WB has been developed and has shown efficacious against viruses, bacteria and parasites in vitro; and has been able to inactivate nucleated blood cells whilst retaining the ability to prepare components with acceptable characteristics. The efficacy of this WB PRT has been demonstrated in vivo using the inactivation of Plasmodium falciparum as a model and showing a high degree of correlation between in vitro and in vivo data. Obtaining further evidence of efficacy on other suitable targets is warranted. Shortening of the process, which is currently around 50min, or increasing the number of units simultaneously processed would be necessary to make PRT WB conducive to LMIC blood services' needs. ConclusionsEven if not 100% effective against agents that are present in high pathogen load titres, WB PRT could massively impact blood safety in LMIC by providing safer products at an affordable cost.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据