4.6 Article

Improved Electrocatalytic Performance of Core-shell NiCo/NiCoOx with amorphous FeOOH for Oxygen-evolution Reaction

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 257, 期 -, 页码 1-8

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.09.093

关键词

Hydrogenation; Hydrogen-evolution reaction (HER); Oxygen-evolution reaction (OER); Electrocatalytic water splitting; FeOOH; Nickel cobalt oxides

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China (NNSFC) [21673105, 21503102]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central University [lzujbky-2015-274, lzujbky-2016-K09]
  3. Foundation of Key Laboratory of Advanced Energy Materials Chemistry (Ministry of Education) in Nankai University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hierarchical NiCo/NiCoOx with amorphous FeOOH electrocatalysts have been fabricated by a low temperature hydrogenation treatment of Ni/Co bimetallic carbonate hydroxide nanowire arrays on Ni foam and subsequent chemical bath deposition process. The NiCo/NiCoOx composites consisted of NiCo alloy core and nickel cobalt oxide shell with the thickness of around 5 nm exhibits excellent electrocatalytic activity for hydrogen-evolution reaction (HER) in 1 M KOH due to the enhanced conductivity and the large defect-rich interface. However, the electrocatalytic activity for oxygen-evolution reaction (OER) is boosted by ultrathin, amorphous and interconnected FeOOH nanosheets grown on the hierarchical NiCo/NiCoOx composites because of the promoted conductivity and electron transfer ability of the metallic NiCo core and the suitable interaction of NiCoOx and FeOOH with OH groups. In oxygen evolution process, a low overpotential of 278 mV is required to achieve a current density of 10 mA cm(-2) for NiCo/NiCoOx@FeOOH samples, and the Tafel slope is only 47.5 mV dec(-1). When integrated NiCo/NiCoOx with NiCo/NiCoOx@ FeOOH in an alkaline electrolyzer, a full water splitting current density of 10 mA cm(-2) and high electrochemical stability can be obtained at 1.65 V. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据