4.2 Article

Plerixafor and granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor for mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells for autologous transplantation in Chinese patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a randomized Phase 3 study

期刊

TRANSFUSION
卷 58, 期 1, 页码 81-87

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/trf.14426

关键词

-

资金

  1. Sanofi

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUNDThis Phase 3 randomized, double-blind study evaluated the efficacy and safety of plerixafor plus granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor for the mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells in Chinese patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODSAdults (ages 18-75 years) with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in first or second complete or partial remission, without previous hematopoietic stem cell mobilization or autologous transplant, were included. Patients received granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor 10 mu g/kg/day from Days 1 through 4 before they were randomized (1:1) to receive either plerixafor 0.24 mg/kg/day or placebo subcutaneously on Days 4 through 7 plus continued granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor on Days 5 through 8. Apheresis began on Day 5 and continued for no more than 4 days. The primary endpoint was collection of 5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg or greater over no more than 4 days of apheresis. Other endpoints included the collection of 2 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg or greater and safety. RESULTSOverall, 101 patients were enrolled, and 50 were randomized to each group. More patients in the plerixafor group achieved 5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg or greater (62 vs. 20%; p<0.0001) or 2 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg or greater (88 vs. 66%) and underwent transplantation (88 vs. 68%) compared with those in the placebo group. The most common plerixafor-related adverse events were nausea (7.8%) and diarrhea (3.9%). CONCLUSIONPlerixafor plus granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor is superior to placebo plus granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor for the mobilization of CD34+ cells for autologous transplantation and is generally well tolerated in Chinese patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据