4.3 Article

Sorption-Reduction Coupled Gold Recovery Process Boosted by Pycnoporus Sanguineus Biomass: Uptake Pattern and Performance Enhancement via Biomass Surface Modification

期刊

BIOTECHNOLOGY PROGRESS
卷 33, 期 5, 页码 1314-1322

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/btpr.2499

关键词

biorecovery; gold; uptake pattern; effective functional group; process intensification

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51178191, 21377041]
  2. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-11-0166]
  3. Guangzhou Science and Technology Project [201604020055]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biorecovery is emerging as a promising process to retrieve gold from secondary resources. The present study aimed to explore the uptake pattern of Pycnoporus sanguineus biomass for gold, identify the effective functional groups in gold recovery process, and thus further intensify the process via microbial surface modification. Results showed that P. sanguineus biomass could effectively recover gold with the formation of highly crystal AuNPs without any exogeneous electron donor. Under the conditions of various initial gold concentrations (1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 mM), biomass dosage of 2.0 g/L, solution pH value of 4.0, and incubation temperature of 30 degrees C, the uptake equilibrium established after 4, 8, and 12 h, respectively. The uptake process could be well described by pseudo-second order kinetics model (R-2 = 0.9988) and Langmuir isotherm model (R-2 = 0.9958). The maximum uptake capacity of P. sanguineus reached as high as 358.69 mg/g. Further analysis indicated that amino, carboxyl and hydroxyl groups positively contributed to the uptake process. Among them, amino group significantly favored the uptake of gold during recovery process. When P. sanguineus biomass was modified by introduction of amino group, the gold uptake process was successfully intensified by shortening the uptake period and enhancing the uptake capacity. (C) 2017 American Institute of Chemical Engineers

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据