4.4 Article

Psychophysiology of proactive and reactive relational aggression

期刊

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY
卷 130, 期 -, 页码 77-85

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.10.005

关键词

Sympathetic nervous system; Parasympathetic nervous system; Skin conductance; Respiratory sinus arrhythmia; Relational aggression; Proactive aggression; Reactive aggression; Social stress

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [BCS-1450777]
  2. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the joint effects of parasympathetic and sympathetic nervous system reactivity to social and non-social stressors on proactive (i.e., goal-directed, unemotional) and reactive (i.e., emotional, impulsive) functions of relational aggression. Two hundred and forty-seven (M-age = 18.77 years) participants completed a series of stressor tasks while their sympathetic arousal (i.e., skin conductance) and parasympathetic arousal (i.e., respiratory sinus arrhythmia) were assessed. Participants also provided self-reports of their aggressive behavior. In the standardized social stressor only, physiological reactivity was related to aggression, such that respiratory sinus arrhythmia augmentation predicted proactive relational aggression whereas heightened skin conductance reactivity predicted reactive relational aggression. Finally, in the context of low skin conductance reactivity, respiratory sinus arrhythmia augmentation was related to heightened proactive and reactive aggression, whereas respiratory sinus arrhythmia withdrawal was protective. Results suggest that the benefits hypothesized to accompany respiratory sinus arrhythmia withdrawal may only occur among individuals with low fight or flight stress responses. Findings extend research on the physiological indicators of aggression to relational aggression, and highlight the importance of assessing functions of aggression, as well as physiological reactivity to multiple stressors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据