4.7 Article

Warm dark matter and the ionization history of the Universe

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 96, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.96.103539

关键词

-

资金

  1. FNRS-FRS
  2. Universite Libre de Bruxelles
  3. Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB)
  4. Belgian Federal Science Policy Office through the Interuniversity Attraction Pole [P7/37]
  5. IISN
  6. Strategic Research Program High-Energy Physics of the VUB
  7. Spanish Grant of the MINECO [FPA2014-57816-P]
  8. Ramon y Cajal contract
  9. Spanish MINECO [FPA2014-54459-P]
  10. Generalitat Valenciana [PROMETEOII/2014/049]
  11. MINECO Grant [SEV-2014-0398]
  12. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant [690575, 674896]
  13. Portuguese FCT through the CFTP-FCT Unit 777 [PEst-OE/FIS/UI0777/2013]
  14. [PROMETEO II/2014/050]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In warm dark matter scenarios structure formation is suppressed on small scales with respect to the cold dark matter case, reducing the number of low-mass halos and the fraction of ionized gas at high redshifts and thus, delaying reionization. This has an impact on the ionization history of the Universe and measurements of the optical depth to reionization, of the evolution of the global fraction of ionized gas and of the thermal history of the intergalactic medium, can be used to set constraints on the mass of the dark matter particle. However, the suppression of the fraction of ionized medium in these scenarios can be partly compensated by varying other parameters, as the ionization efficiency or the minimum mass for which halos can host star-forming galaxies. Here we use different data sets regarding the ionization and thermal histories of the Universe and, taking into account the degeneracies from several astrophysical parameters, we obtain a lower bound on the mass of thermal warm dark matter candidates of m(X) > 1.3 keV, or m(s) > 5.5 keV for the case of sterile neutrinos nonresonantly produced in the early Universe, both at 90% confidence level.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据