4.5 Article

Lipopolysaccharide suppresses IgE-mast cell-mediated reactions

期刊

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY
卷 47, 期 12, 页码 1574-1585

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cea.13013

关键词

anaphylaxis; IgE; innate immunity and TLR-4 signalling; mast cells

资金

  1. NIH [R01 AI073553, R01 DK090119, P30DK078392, U19A1070235]
  2. Food Allergy Research Education Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Clinical and experimental analyses have identified a central role for IgE/FceRI/mast cells in promoting IgE-mediated anaphylaxis. Recent data from human studies suggest that bacterial infections can alter susceptibility to anaphylaxis. Objective: We examined the effect of LPS exposure on the induction of IgE-mast cell (MC) mediated reactions in mice. Methods: C57BL/6 WT, tlr4(-/-) and IL10(-/-) mice were exposed to LPS, and serum cytokines (TNF and IL-10) were measured. Mice were subsequently treated with anti-IgE, and the symptoms of passive IgE-mediated anaphylaxis, MC activation, Ca2+-mobilization and the expression of FceRI on peritoneal MCs were quantitated. Results: We show that LPS exposure of C57BL/6 WT mice constraints IgE-MCmediated reactions. LPS-induced suppression of IgE-MC-mediated responses was TLR-4-dependent and associated with increased systemic IL-10 levels, decreased surface expression of FceRI on MCs and loss of sensitivity to IgE activation. Notably, LPS-induced desensitization of MCs was short term with MC sensitivity to IgE reconstituted within 48 hours, which was associated with recapitulation of FceRI expression on the MCs. Mechanistic analyses revealed a requirement for IL-10 in LPS-mediated decrease in MC FceRI surface expression. Conclusions & Clinical Relevance: Collectively, these studies suggest that LPSinduced IL-10 promotes the down-regulation of MC surface FceRI expression and leads to desensitization of mice to IgE-mediated reactions. These studies indicate that targeting of the LPS-TLR-4-IL-10 pathway may be used as a therapeutic approach to prevent adverse IgE-mediated reactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据