4.2 Article

Histopathology and analyses of inflammation intensity in the gills of mussels exposed to silver nanoparticles: role of nanoparticle size, exposure time, and uptake pathways

期刊

TOXICOLOGY MECHANISMS AND METHODS
卷 27, 期 8, 页码 582-591

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/15376516.2017.1337258

关键词

Innate immunity; inflammation; nanotoxicity; Mytilus galloprovincialis; immunotoxicity

资金

  1. Immuno-microbiology, Environmental and Cancerogesis IMEC Research Unit (Sciences Faculty of Bizerte, University of Carthage)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Environmentally induced perturbation of health parameters lead to morphological changes associated to the inflammatory response. Hematoxyline and eosin (H&E)-stained gill filaments sections were examined for such changes and inflammation intensity was scored according to a quantitative model in order to evaluate the health status of in vivo exposed (for 3, 6, and 12 h) mussels to silver nanoparticles (Ag-NPs < 50nm and Ag-NPs < 100 nm) prior and after the inhibition of two potential uptake pathways (clathrin-and caveolae-mediated endocytosis) with the aid of pharmaceutical inhibitors (amantadine and nystatin). The impacts of the nanoparticles (NPs) size, as well as their uptake routes within different time of exposure on the inflammatory response were assessed. The results showed that Ag-NPs clearly induced morphological changes associated to the inflammatory response in gill tissues (Mann-Whitney p values were <. 05). It is also clear that the length of the exposure as well as the NP size highly impacted inflammation intensity (highest histopathological indices recorded with Ag-NPs < 100 nm). Also, the routes of NPs entry noticed to be major factor underlying inflammatory response (significant inflammation intensity reported with Ag-NPs < 50nm after blockade of uptake routes; p<. 05). Throughout, it was concluded that inflammation intensity was related to NPs size and exposure time. Overall, uptake routes are shown to be the major factor underlying nanotoxicity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据