4.5 Article

Mechanism of triclosan toxicity: Mitochondrial dysfunction including complex II inhibition, superoxide release and uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation

期刊

TOXICOLOGY LETTERS
卷 275, 期 -, 页码 108-117

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2017.05.004

关键词

Triclosan; Mitochondria; Uncoupler; Complex II inhibitor; Superoxide anion; Qd-binding site

资金

  1. Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation [14.Z50.31.0028]
  2. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [14-04-01664a]
  3. Magnus Ehrnrooth Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Triclosan (5-chloro-2'-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)phenol), a widely used antibacterial agent, exerts adverse effects on the organism of mammals. Recent research reviled that triclosan at low micromolar concentrations causes mitochondrial dysfunction in many cell types, but the mechanisms of its effect are not fully understood. Here we show that exposure to triclosan disrupted membrane potential, prevented the calcium uptake-driven high amplitude mitochondrial swelling, stimulated the respiration in the presence of complex I substrates, and suppressed the ADP-stimulated respiration in the presence of complex II substrate, succinate. Triclosan directly inhibited complex II activity. Similar to the complex II inhibitor thenoyltrifluoroacetone, triclosan induced the oxidation of the cytochromes b566 and b562 and caused the release of mitochondrial superoxide. Opposite to thenoyltrifluoroacetone, triclosan increased superoxide release synergistically with myxothiazol but not with antimycin A, indicating different topology of superoxide-producing sites. We concluded that triclosan is unique by its capability of acting as both a protonophore and an unusual complex II inhibitor, which interferes with the mitochondrial respiration by blocking the electron transfer between ubiquinone at the Qd-binding site and heme b. Our data can provide an insight into the mechanisms of the carcinogenic effect of triclosan in the liver and other tissues.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据