4.5 Article

Dihydromyricetin modulates p62 and autophagy crosstalk with the Keap-1/Nrf2 pathway to alleviate ethanol-induced hepatic injury

期刊

TOXICOLOGY LETTERS
卷 274, 期 -, 页码 31-41

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2017.04.009

关键词

Dihydromyricetin; Liver injury; p62; Keap-1/Nrf2 pathway; Autophagy

资金

  1. State of Traditional Chinese Medicine Industry special project [201507002]
  2. Science of Chinese Traditional Medicine
  3. National Science Foundation of China [81303224, 81603349]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Increasing evidence has demonstrated that dihydromyricetin (DMY) contains highly effective antioxidative, anti-inflammatory, anti-microbial and anti-diabetic properties. Nevertheless, the underlying hepatoprotective mechanisms of DMY have infrequently been reported thus far. In the present study, C57BL/6 mice were fed with the Lieber-DeCarli diet containing alcohol or isocaloric maltose dextrin as a control diet with or without DMY (75 and 150 mg/kg/d bw) for 6 weeks. DMY significantly attenuated hepatic enzyme release, hepatic lipid peroxidation and triglyceride deposition induced by chronic alcohol exposure. In addition, DMY dramatically attenuated the alcohol-triggered elevation of the level of inflammatory cytokines and partially recovered hepatic pathological changes. Notably, DMY remarkably modified aberrant expression of CYP2E1, Keap-1 and HO-1 in the liver and simultaneously ameliorated disordered nuclear localization of NF-kappa B and Nrf2 to exert its hepatoprotective effects. Further mechanistic exploration suggested that DMY activated Nrf2, possibly mediated through the autophagy pathway. Analysis of the crosstalk among p62, Keap-1 and Nrf2 demonstrated that the p62 upregulation caused by DMY contributes to a positive feedback loop in Nrf2 activation. In summary, DMY likely modulates p62 and autophagy crosstalk with the Keap-1/Nrf2 pathway to alleviate liver steatosis and the inflammatory response in the pathological progression of ALD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据