4.5 Article

Study of drying kinetics of salmon processing by-products at different temperatures and the quality of extracted fish oil

期刊

DRYING TECHNOLOGY
卷 35, 期 16, 页码 1981-1993

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/07373937.2017.1293684

关键词

By-products; drying; drying model; fatty acid; salmon

资金

  1. Research and Development Corporation of Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
  2. Ignite RD program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Samples of salmon processing by-products were minced, mixed, and partially dried to moisture content of 90 +/- 5% (dry basis), at two different temperatures 60 and 100(C degrees) (using hot air-drying and oven-drying, respectively). Theoretical and semitheoretical drying models were used for modeling of the drying kinetics of salmon by-products mix, where Page model and logarithmic models were observed as the best models presenting the drying kinetics of salmon by-products at 60 and 100 degrees C, respectively. Salmon by-product oil was extracted from the partially dried by-product through centrifugation and was compared with enzymatically extracted (enzymatic extraction method was considered as the control method) salmon oil, in terms of fatty acid profile of the oils. The oil content obtained through semidried samples and enzymatically treated samples ranged between 16.234 and 18.212 g/100 g of fresh sample, which were not significantly different. The fatty acid composition was similar in all the cases. The fatty acids predominantly observed in the salmon oils included oleic acid, linoleic acid, and palmitic acid. Other fatty acids included palmitoleic acid, stearic acid, vaccenic acid, gondoic acid, and myristic acid. Docosahexaenoic acid and eicosapentaenoic acid contents were between 1 and 2% of the oil extracted in all the cases, and DPA (Docosapentaenoic acid) content was approximately 1%. Hence, partial dehydration at both the temperatures was concluded as a potential processing method for increasing the storability of salmon by-products and obtaining salmon oil with high quality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据