4.5 Article

Effects of mild ozonisation on gene expression and nuclear domains organization in vitro

期刊

TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO
卷 44, 期 -, 页码 100-110

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2017.06.021

关键词

Ozone; Human neuroblastoma cells; Cell nucleus; Transmission electron microscopy; Whole gene expression

资金

  1. University of Verona
  2. Doctoral Program in Nanoscience and advanced technologies of the University of Verona

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the last two decades, the use of ozone (O-3) as a complementary medical approach has progressively been increasing; however, its application is still limited due to the numerous doubts about its possible toxicity, despite the low concentrations used in therapy. For an appropriate and safe clinical application of a potentially toxic agent such as O-3, it is crucial to elucidate the cellular response to its administration. Molecular analyses and transmission electron microscopy were here combined to investigate in vitro the effects of O-3 administration on transcriptional activity and nuclear domains organization of cultured SH-SY5Y neuronal cells; low O-3 concentrations were used as those currently administered in clinical practice. Mild ozonisation did not affect cell proliferation or death, while molecular analyses showed an O-3-induced modulation of some genes involved in the cell response to stress (HMOX1, ERCC4, CDKNIA) and in the transcription machinery (CTDSPI). Ultrastructural cytochemistry after experiments of bromouridine incorporation consistently demonstrated an increased transcriptional rate at both the nucleoplasmic (mRNA) and the nudeolar (rRNA) level. No ultra structural alteration of nuclear domains was observed. Our molecular, ultrastructural and cytochemical data demonstrate that a mild toxic stimulus such as mild ozonisation stimulate cell protective pathways and nuclear transcription, without altering cell viability. This could possibly account for the positive effects observed in ozone-treated patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据