4.7 Article

Fluoride potentiates tubulointerstitial nephropathy caused by unilateral ureteral obstruction

期刊

TOXICOLOGY
卷 392, 期 -, 页码 106-118

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tox.2017.10.003

关键词

Fluoride; Kidney; Unilateral ureteral obstruction model; M2 macrophage; TGF-beta(1); Tuburointerstitial fibrosis

资金

  1. native check for Forte Science Communications

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The contamination of ground water by fluoride has been reported worldwide. Most fluoride (approximately 70%) is filtered by the kidneys; humans or experimental animals with renal damage therefore may be more affected by fluoride exposure than those with normal kidney function. Tubulointerstitial fibrosis, which involves macrophage-promoted extracellular matrix production and myofibroblast migration, can be induced in rats by unilateral ureteral obstruction (UUO). We examined the effects of fluoride exposure on tubulointerstitial fibrosis in the obstructed kidney of UUO rats. The left ureters of 6-week-old male rats were ligated using silk sutures. Fluoride was then administered for 2 weeks at doses of 0, 75, and 150 ppm in the drinking water. Real-time polymerase chain reaction was performed to analyze transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF beta(1)) transcription; histological and immunohistochemical staining were used to identify positive areas within the renal cortex and staining-positive cells by image analysis. Significant increases were observed in the obstructed kidneys of UUO rats exposed to 150 ppm fluoride (compared to 0 ppm) for areas or number of cells that stained with Masson trichrome or with antibodies against collagen type I, alpha-smooth muscle actin (alpha-SMA, a myofibroblast marker), ED1, ED2, and ED3 (macrophage markers), and TGF-beta(1). Taken together, these observations suggested that fluoride exacerbates tuburointerstitial nephropathy resulting from UUO, and that this effect occurs via activation of the M2 macrophage-TGF-beta 1-fibroblast/myofibroblast-collagen synthesis pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据