4.7 Article

Investigation of novel dexrazoxane analogue JR-311 shows significant cardioprotective effects through topoisomerase IIbeta but not its iron chelating metabolite

期刊

TOXICOLOGY
卷 392, 期 -, 页码 1-10

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tox.2017.09.012

关键词

Bis-dioxopiperazine; Cardioprotection; JR-311; Structure-activity relationship; Topoisomerase

资金

  1. Charles University in Prague [GAUK 1324214]
  2. Czech Science Foundation [GACR 13-15008S]
  3. Reaserch ProjectPROGRES Q40

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Novel dexrazoxane derivative JR-311 was prepared to investigate structure-activity relationships and mechanism(s) of protection against anthracycline cardiotoxicity. Its cardioprotective, antiproliferative, iron (Fe) chelation and inhibitory and/or depletory activities on topoisomerase Meta (TOP2B) were examined and compared with dexrazoxane. While in standard assay, JR-311 failed in both cardioprotection and depletion of TOP2B, its repeated administration to cell culture media led to depletion of TOP2B and significant protection of isolated rat neonatal ventricular cardiomyocytes from daunorubicin-induced damage. This effect was explained by a focused analytical investigation that revealed rapid JR-311 decomposition, resulting in negligible intracellular concentrations of the parent compound but high exposure of cells to the decomposition products, including Fe-chelating JR-H2. Although chemical instability is an obstacle for the development of JR-311, this study identified a novel dexrazoxane analogue with preserved pharmacodynamic properties, contributed to the investigation of structure-activity relationships and suggested that the cardioprotection of bis-dioxopiperazines is likely attributed to TOP2B activity of the parent compound rather than Fe chelation of their hydrolytic metabolites/degradation products. Moreover, this study highlights the importance of early stability testing during future development of novel dexrazoxane analogues.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据