4.6 Article

IKKβ Activation in the Fetal Lung Mesenchyme Alters Lung Vascular Development but Not Airway Morphogenesis

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 187, 期 12, 页码 2635-2644

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2017.08.013

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [HL086324, HL126703, HL097195, 5R25GM059994]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the immature Lung, inflammation and injury disrupt the epithelial mesenchymal interactions required for normal development. Innate immune signaling and NE-kappa B activation disrupt the normal expression of multiple mesenchymal genes that play a key role in airway branching and alveolar formation. To test the role of the NF-kappa B pathway specifically in lung mesenchyme, we utilized the mesenchymal Twist2-Cre to drive expression of a constitutively active inhibitor of NE-kappa B kinase subunit beta (IKK beta ca) mutant in developing mice. Embryonic Twist2-IKK beta ca mice were generated in expected numbers and appeared grossly normal. Airway branching also appeared normal in Twist2-IK beta ca embryos, with airway morphometry, elastin staining, and saccular branching similar to those in control littermates. While Twist2-IKK beta ca lungs did not contain increased levels of Il1b, we did measure an increased expression of the chemokine-encoding gene Ccl2. Twist2-IKK beta ca lungs had increased staining for the vascular marker platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule 1. In addition, type I alveolar epithelial differentiation appeared to be diminished in Twist2-IKK beta ca Lungs. The normal airway branching and Lack of Il1b expression may have been due to the inability of the Twist2-IKK beta ca transgene to induce inflammasome activity. While Twist2-IKK beta ca lungs had an increased number of macrophages, inflammasome expression remained restricted to macrophages without evidence of spontaneous inflammasome activity. These results emphasize the importance of cellular niche in considering how inflammatory signaling influences fetal lung development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据