4.7 Article

A recurrent de novo mutation in TMEM106B causes hypomyelinating leukodystrophy

期刊

BRAIN
卷 140, 期 -, 页码 3105-3111

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awx314

关键词

hypomyelinating leukodystrophies; TMEM106B; myelin; MRI; lysosomes

资金

  1. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council [NHMRC 1068278]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hypomyelinating leukodystrophies are a heterogeneous group of disorders. Simons et al. identify four patients with brain hypomyelination and a remarkably benign clinical presentation, all with the same dominant missense mutation in TMEM106B encoding a protein involved in lysosomal trafficking. The findings emphasize the essential role that lysosomes play in myelination.See Zhou and Rademakers (doi:10.1093/brain/awx318) for a scientific commentary on this article. Hypomyelinating leukodystrophies are a heterogeneous group of disorders with a clinical presentation that often includes early-onset nystagmus, ataxia and spasticity and a wide range of severity. Using next-generation sequencing techniques and GeneMatcher, we identified four unrelated patients with brain hypomyelination, all with the same recurrent dominant mutation, c.754G > A p.(Asp252Asn), in TMEM106B. The mutation was confirmed as de novo in three of the cases, and the mildly affected father of the fourth affected individual was confirmed as mosaic for this variant. The protein encoded by TMEM106B is poorly characterized but is reported to have a role in regulation of lysosomal trafficking. Polymorphisms in TMEM106B are thought to modify disease onset in frontotemporal dementia, but its relation to myelination is not understood. Clinical presentation in three of the four patients is remarkably benign compared to other hypomyelinating disorders, with congenital nystagmus and mild motor delay. These findings add TMEM106B to the growing list of genes causing hypomyelinating disorders and emphasize the essential role lysosomes play in myelination.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据