4.7 Article

Production and molecular characterization of bread wheat lines with reduced amount of α-type gliadins

期刊

BMC PLANT BIOLOGY
卷 17, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12870-017-1211-3

关键词

Gluten; alpha-gliadins; Celiac disease; Bread wheat; Deletion lines

资金

  1. Barilla G. e R. F.lli S.p.A.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Among wheat gluten proteins, the alpha-type gliadins are the major responsible for celiac disease, an autoimmune disorder that affects about 1% of the world population. In fact, these proteins contain several toxic and immunogenic epitopes that trigger the onset of the disease. The alpha-type gliadins are a multigene family, encoded by genes located at the complex Gli-2 loci. Results: Here, three bread wheat deletion lines (Gli-A2, Gli-D2 and Gli-A2/Gli-D2) at the Gli-2 loci were generated by the introgression in the bread wheat cultivar Pegaso of natural mutations, detected in different bread wheat cultivars. The molecular characterization of these lines allowed the isolation of 49 unique expressed genes coding alpha-type gliadins, that were assigned to each of the three Gli-2 loci. The number and the amount of alpha-type gliadin transcripts were drastically reduced in the deletion lines. In particular, the line Gli-A2/Gli-D2 contained only 12 active alpha-type gliadin genes (-75.6% respect to the cv. Pegaso) and a minor level of transcripts (-80% compared to cv. Pegaso). Compensatory pleiotropic effects were observed in the two other classes of gliadins (omega- and gamma-gliadins) either at gene expression or protein levels. Although the comparative analysis of the deduced amino acid sequences highlighted the typical structural features of alpha-type gliadin proteins, substantial differences were displayed among the 49 proteins for the presence of toxic and immunogenic epitopes. Conclusion: The deletion line Gli-A2/Gli-D2 did not contain the 33-mer peptide, one of the major epitopes triggering the celiac disease, representing an interesting material to develop less toxic wheat varieties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据