4.8 Article

A Pumpless Acoustofluidic Platform for Size-Selective Concentration and Separation of Microparticles

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 89, 期 24, 页码 13575-13581

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b04014

关键词

-

资金

  1. KUSTAR-KAIST Institute
  2. Creative Research Initiatives program of the National Research Foundation of Korea (MSIP) [2017-013369]
  3. Korea Polar Research Institute (KOPRI)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have designed a pumpless acoustofluidic device for the concentration and separation of different-sized particles inside a single-layered straight polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) microfluidic channel. The proposed device comprises two parallel interdigitated transducers (IDTs) positioned underneath the PDMS micro channel. The IDTs produce high-frequency surface acoustic waves that,generate semipermeable virtual acoustic radiation force field walls that selectively trap and concentrate larger particles at different locations inside the microchannel and allow the smaller particles to pass through the acoustic filter. The performance of the acoustofluidic device was first characterized by injecting into the microchannel a uniform flow of suspended 9.9 pm diameter particles with various initial concentrations (as low as 10 particles/mL) using a syringe pump. The particles were trapped with 100% efficiency by a single IDT actuated at 73 MHz. The acoustofluidic platform was used, to demonstrate the pumpless separation of 12.0, 4.8, and 2.1 dam microparticles by trapping the 12 and 4.8 mu m particles using the two IDTs actuated at 73 and 140 MHz, respectively. However, most of the 2.1 mu m particles flowed over the IDTs unaffected. The acoustofluidic device was capable of rapidly processing a large volume of sample fluid pumped through the microchannel using an external syringe pump. A small volume of the sample fluid was processed through the device using a capillary flow and a hydrodynamic pressure difference that did not require an external pumping device.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据