4.7 Article

Crushing analysis and multiobjective optimization design for rectangular unequal triple-cell tubes subjected to axial loading

期刊

THIN-WALLED STRUCTURES
卷 117, 期 -, 页码 190-198

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2017.04.018

关键词

Triple-cell section; Axial crushing; Theoretical prediction; Multiobjective optimization

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51405123]
  2. Open Fund of Key Laboratory of Advanced Manufacture Technology for Automobile Parts (Chongqing University of Technology), Ministry of Education of China [2014KLMT03]
  3. Open Fund of Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Automobile Safety Technology [2009E10013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multi-cell thin-walled tubes have proven to be better in energy absorption than plain square tubes subjected to axial compression. Therefore, square multi-cell structures have been extensively utilized as energy absorbers in automobiles. This paper provides an investigation on the crashworthiness of rectangular single-, double- and triple-cell columns under axial loading and an optimization design of rectangular unequal triple-cell tubes. First, a theoretical solution is derived for the mean crushing force (MCF) of tubes with unequal triple-cell configuration. Second, quasi-static crushing experiments and finite element analyses (FEA) are conducted on single-, double- and unequal triple-cell columns. Theoretical predictions compare well with experimental and numerical data, and all results show that the triple-cell tubes exhibit the best crashworthiness among all the samples. Third, in order to study effects of wall thickness distribution and the layout of internal ribs on crashing behavior, multiobjective optimization design is implemented combining Radial Basis Function (RBF) model with Non-dominant sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II). The optimal solution obtained from Pareto frontier indicates that unequal triple-cell tube with appropriate thickness distribution and arrangement of internal ribs is superior in energy absorption to initial design.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据