4.7 Article

Research on the progressive damage model and trigger geometry of composite waved beam to improve crashworthiness

期刊

THIN-WALLED STRUCTURES
卷 119, 期 -, 页码 531-543

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2017.07.004

关键词

Damage model; Composite; Waved beam; Crashworthiness; Trigger geometry

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11402011]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [201401390741]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A nonlinear progressive damage model is proposed to predict the failure response of composite waved beam subjected to quasi-static axial crushing. To predict the failure model, both of the intra-laminar failure and de lamination are considered. Based on continuum damage mechanics(CDM), the in-plane damage initiation is modeled with the maximum-stress failure criterion. To simulate the failed material, a stiffness degradation method combined with exponential damage evolution laws is adopted. A fracture-energy approach in conjunction with the characteristic element length is chosen to predict the damage evolution. The delamination initiation is given by a quadratic nominal-stress criterion. Considering the progressive delamination failure process, a cohesive stiffness degradation method and an exponential softening law based on a mix-mode fracture criterion are presented to predict the delamination propagation. To achieve better crashworthiness of composite waved beam, the wedge-trigger, two types of W-triggers and bevel-triggers with hybrid angles are proposed. Additionally, effect of the angle of chamfer-trigger on crashworthiness is investigated. Numerical results show that predictions correlate well with experimental results. Moreover, the present damage model can accurately capture intra-laminar and inter-laminar failure mechanisms. The proposed bevel-triggers perform significant effect in decreasing the peak load, and angles of chamfer-trigger make little difference in the crashworthiness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据