4.4 Article

Characterization of IrOx sputtering for IrO2 and IrO2/Pt bottom-electrode piezoelectric micro-electro-mechanical systems applications

期刊

THIN SOLID FILMS
卷 638, 期 -, 页码 127-137

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2017.07.024

关键词

Iridium oxide; Platinum; Bilayer; Sputtering; Electrode; Ferroelectric; Structure; Reliability

资金

  1. FEI Company
  2. US Army [W911NF-15-2-0118, W911NF-11-2-0053]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the effects of sputter deposition growth conditions on IrO2 thin films developed as electrode layers for Pb(ZrxTi1-x)O-3 piezoelectric Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems applications. For IrO2 thin-film bottom electrodes sputter deposited on {100}-textured, rutile structure, TiO2 template layers, the effects of substrate temperature, Ar and O-2 flow rates, and post-deposition anneal were studied. Additionally, the impact of various IrO2/Pt bilayer structures on electrode properties were investigated. IrO2 bottom electrodes grown on 100-oriented TiO2 at 500 degrees C with an Ar flow rate of 100 sccm, O-2 flow rate of 60 sccm, and a nominal 100 nm thickness exhibited a film sheet resistance of 9.2 +/- 0.212/sq., surface roughness of 23 0.1 nm measured over a 2 mu m x 2 mu m area, and a rutile structure, preferred-{100} crystalline fiber texture normal to the substrate plane. Furnace anneal treatments on this electrode at 650 degrees C for 30 min in 3 SLM O-2 improved its sheet resistance to 7.5 0.2 St/sq., and surface roughness was 4.0 +/- 0.1 nm. Bilayers of IrO2/Pt grown on TiO2, with IrO2 and Pt thicknesses in the 0-100 nm range, were sputter deposited at 500 degrees C. The electrodes had composite sheet resistances in the range of 134 +/- 0.03 Omega/sq. to 9.92 +/- 0.25 Omega/sq., and surface roughnesses ranging from 1.5 +/- 0.1 nm to 2.0 +/- 0.1 nm for 2 mu m x 2 mu m measurement areas. Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy verified preferred IrO2 and Pt crystalline fiber textures of {100} and {111}, respectively. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据