4.6 Article

Erosion of Fe-W model system under normal and oblige D ion irradiation

期刊

NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND ENERGY
卷 12, 期 -, 页码 468-471

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nme.2017.03.030

关键词

Plasma-wall-interaction; Sputtering; Erosion; Iron-tungsten; Ripple formation

资金

  1. Euratom research and training programme [633053]
  2. KKKO (commission for the coordination of fusion research in Austria at the Austrian Academy of Sciences - OAW)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The dynamic erosion behaviour of iron-tungsten (Fe-W) model films (with 1.5 at% W) resulting from 250 eV deuterium (D) irradiation is investigated under well-defined laboratory conditions. For three different impact angles (0 degrees, 45 degrees and 60 degrees with respect to the surface normal) the erosion yield is monitored as a function of incident D fluence using a highly sensitive quartz crystal microbalance technique (QCM). In addition the evolution of the Fe-W film topography and roughness with increasing fluence is observed using an atomic force microscope (AFM). The mass removal rate for Fe-W is found to be comparable to the value of a pure Fe film at low incident fluences but strongly decreases with increasing D fluence. This is consistent with earlier observations of a substantial W enrichment at the surface due to preferential Fe sputtering. The reduction of the mass removal rate is initially more pronounced for irradiation under oblique angles as compared to normal incidence, but the differences vanish for fluences > 2.10(23) D/m(2) High resolution AFM images reveal that continued ion irradiation leads to significant surface roughening and (depending on ion impact angle) formation of nanodots or nano-ripples. This may indicate that the W enrichment at the surface due to preferential sputtering of Fe is not exclusively responsible for the observed reduction in erosion with increasing D fluence. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据