4.6 Article

Lexical neutrality in environmental health research: Reflections on the term walkability

期刊

BMC PUBLIC HEALTH
卷 17, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-017-4943-y

关键词

Neighbourhood environments; Neighbourhood walkability; Health; Physical activity; Neighbourhood physical activity environments

资金

  1. Lifelong Health and Wellbeing Cross-Council Programme [MR/K025147/1]
  2. MRC Epidemiology Unit Programme [MC_UU_12015/4]
  3. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [FRN 146766]
  4. ESRC [ES/G007462/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. MRC [MR/K025147/1, MR/K023187/1, MC_UU_12015/4] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/G007462/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Medical Research Council [MR/K025147/1, MC_UU_12015/4, MR/K023187/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neighbourhood environments have important implications for human health. In this piece, we reflect on the environments and health literature and argue that precise use of language is critical for acknowledging the complex and multifaceted influence that neighbourhood environments may have on physical activity and physical activity-related outcomes. Specifically, we argue that the term neighbourhood walkability, commonly used in the neighbourhoods and health literature, constrains recognition of the breadth of influence that neighbourhood environments might have on a variety of physical activity behaviours. The term draws attention to a single type of physical activity and implies that a universal association exists when in fact the literature is quite mixed. To maintain neutrality in this area of research, we suggest that researchers adopt the term neighbourhood physical activity environments for collective measures of neighbourhood attributes that they wish to study in relation to physical activity behaviours or physical activity-related health outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据