4.3 Article

Structural analysis of Late Paleozoic deformation of central Dalabutefault zone, West Junggar, China

期刊

ACTA PETROLOGICA SINICA
卷 33, 期 10, 页码 2987-3001

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS

关键词

West Junggar; Strike-slip structure; Dalabute Fault; Late Paleozoic; Sinistral strike-slip

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Researches of strike-slip faults play a significant role in the research of the accretion and evolution process of the Altaids, whose main tectonic units all separated by regional strike-slip faults. Dalabute fault is an important strike-slip fault developed within the West Junggar Orogen. The fault was hotly debated on its kinematics and age. Some representative models have been proposed: strike slip fault, thrust fault or transpressional fault, etc. We discussed the kinematics and age of the Dalabute fault in this article based on our field observation in central part of the fault, combined with research results of previous geochronological studies of the volcanic rocks, turbidites and post-collisional granite plutons. We have confirmed the existence of two-stage deformation between Late Carboniferous and Permian. The early one concerns a Late Carboniferous (320Ma) ductile sinistral strike-slip event which is the main deformation event, and the second one shows a folding event which presented by folds with SE-inclined axial planes developed within the ductile-brittle transitional condition, and formed before the deposition of the Permian strata. We also reported some geological structure showing dextral strike-slip, and they might be the result of folding of the early sinistral strike-slip structure, or the relics of an earlier dextral strike-slip event. The multi-stage deformation along the Dalabute fault is a record of post-orogenic extension and strike-slip tectonic adjusting in the West Junggar area, and it's a concrete reflection of the large scale intracontinental tectonic adjusting developed within Central Asia from Late Carboniferous to Early Permian.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据