4.1 Article

Validation of the salivary urea and creatinine tests as screening methods of chronic kidney disease in Vietnamese patients

期刊

ACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA
卷 75, 期 8, 页码 551-556

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00016357.2017.1356467

关键词

Saliva; serum; urea; creatinine; cut-off value; kidney chronic disease

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: The aims of this case control study were to correlate the serum and salivary urea as well as creatinine levels; and to evaluate salivary urea and creatinine as noninvasive alternatives to serum for creatinine estimation in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients.Methods: Blood and saliva samples were collected from 112 CKD patients and 108 subjects without CKD for quantitative analysis of urea and creatinine. Spearman's correlation coefficients between salivary and serum urea as well as creatinine were obtained. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was done to assess the diagnostic tests of salivary urea and creatinine. Cut-off values were determined based on the best trade-off between the sensitivity and specificity for both salivary urea and creatinine.Results: Salivary urea and creatinine concentrations were significantly higher in CKD patients than those in control subjects; and increased by the stages of the severity of the disease. The positive correlation was significantly found between salivary and serum creatinine (r=0.90) and between salivary and serum urea (r=0.73). Area under the curve for salivary urea was 0.76 and a cut-off value of 14.25mmol/L gave a sensitivity of 82.9% and specificity of 57.8%. Area under the curve for salivary creatinine was 0.92 and a cut-off value of 0.24mg/dL gave a sensitivity of 86.5% and specificity of 87.2%.Conclusions: Both salivary urea and creatinine have a high capacity for serum creatinine estimation. Salivary urea and creatinine tests can be used as low-cost, easily accessible and noninvasive tools for screening, diagnosing, monitoring treatment outcomes and ascertaining prognosis of chronic kidney disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据