4.6 Article

Clinical utility and tolerability of transcranial direct current stimulation in mild cognitive impairment

期刊

ASIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
卷 30, 期 -, 页码 135-140

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajp.2017.09.001

关键词

tDCS; Cognition; Mild cognitive impairment (MCI)

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology research grant [DST/SJF/LSA-02/2014-15]
  2. Indian Council of Medical Research [DHR/HRD/Young Scientist/Type-VI-(2)/2015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Neuromodulatory interventions like transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is emerging as a potential therapeutic strategy to promote cognitive function in healthy and pathological aging. There is need for more studies evaluating the utility and tolerability of tDCS in Mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Since MCI is considered as the prodromal stage of dementia, it has emerged as the most important target for intervention in dementia. Objective and method: This study investigated the feasibility, tolerability and clinical utility of tDCS in patients with MCI. In this observational study that included 11 patients with MCI, tDCS with an intensity of 2 mA and duration of 20 minutes per day was administered for 5 consecutive days with anode over left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and cathode over right supra orbital region. Treatment outcome was measured using picture memory impairment test (PMIT) immediately and also 1 month after the 5th session of tDCS Results: All the patients tolerated tDCS sessions without any significant adverse effects. Stimulation of left DLPFC with tDCS was noted to significantly improve the immediate and delayed recall performance of the patients in PMIT after five days of stimulation and most of the benefits were persistent at one month follow up. Conclusion: This study findings suggests that tDCS is safe and potentially beneficial in combating cognitive deficits in patients with MCI and provides a framework for further studies with better methodology (randomized and sham controlled trial) to investigate the same.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据