4.7 Article

Mitigation of inbreeding while preserving genetic gain in genomic breeding programs for outbred plants

期刊

THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS
卷 130, 期 5, 页码 969-980

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00122-017-2863-y

关键词

-

资金

  1. Victorian Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources, Victoria, Australia
  2. New Zealand Agriseeds, Christchurch, New Zealand
  3. Royal Barenbrug Group, the Netherlands
  4. Dairy Futures Cooperative Research Centre

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Heuristic genomic inbreeding controls reduce inbreeding in genomic breeding schemes without reducing genetic gain. Genomic selection is increasingly being implemented in plant breeding programs to accelerate genetic gain of economically important traits. However, it may cause significant loss of genetic diversity when compared with traditional schemes using phenotypic selection. We propose heuristic strategies to control the rate of inbreeding in outbred plants, which can be categorised into three types: controls during mate allocation, during selection, and simultaneous selection and mate allocation. The proposed mate allocation measure GminF allocates two or more parents for mating in mating groups that minimise coancestry using a genomic relationship matrix. Two types of relationship-adjusted genomic breeding values for parent selection candidates () and potential offspring () are devised to control inbreeding during selection and even enabling simultaneous selection and mate allocation. These strategies were tested in a case study using a simulated perennial ryegrass breeding scheme. As compared to the genomic selection scheme without controls, all proposed strategies could significantly decrease inbreeding while achieving comparable genetic gain. In particular, the scenario using in simultaneous selection and mate allocation reduced inbreeding to one-third of the original genomic selection scheme. The proposed strategies are readily applicable in any outbred plant breeding program.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据