4.6 Article

Individualized positive end-expiratory pressure in obese patients during general anaesthesia: a randomized controlled clinical trial using electrical impedance tomography

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA
卷 119, 期 6, 页码 1194-1205

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aex192

关键词

bariatric surgery; lung volume measurements; obesity; morbid; positive-pressure respiration; pulmonary gas exchange

资金

  1. Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Germany [FKZ: 01EO1001, K7-21N]
  2. Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Leipzig
  3. CAPES Foundation
  4. Ministry of Education of Brazil [BEX10876/13-8]
  5. Brazilian Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) [306173/2013-6]
  6. Carlos Chagas Filho Rio de Janeiro State Research Supporting Foundation (FAPERJ) [E26/111.055/ 2013, E26/010.002844/2014]
  7. CAPES [400941/2012-0]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. General anaesthesia leads to atelectasis, reduced end-expiratory lung volume (EELV), and diminished arterial oxygenation in obese patients. We hypothesized that a combination of a recruitment manoeuvre (RM) and individualized positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) can avoid these effects. Methods. Patients with a BMI a parts per thousand 35 kg m(-2) undergoing elective laparoscopic surgery were randomly allocated to mechanical ventilation with a tidal volume of 8 ml kg(-1) predicted body weight and (i) an RM followed by individualized PEEP titrated using electrical impedance tomography (PEEPIND) or (ii) no RM and PEEP of 5 cm H2O (PEEP5). Gas exchange, regional ventilation distribution, and EELV (multiple breath nitrogen washout method) were determined before, during, and after anaesthesia. The primary end point was the ratio of arterial partial pressure of oxygen to inspiratory oxygen fraction (PaO2/FiO(2)). Results. For PEEPIND (n=25) and PEEP5 (n=25) arms together, PaO2/FiO(2) and EELV decreased by 15 kPa [95% confidence interval (CI) 11-20 kPa, P < 0.001] and 1.2 litres (95% CI 0.9-1.6 litres, P < 0.001), respectively, after intubation. Mean (sd) PEEPIND was 18.5 (5.6) cm H2O. In the PEEPIND arm, PaO2/FiO(2) before extubation was 23 kPa higher (95% CI 16-29 kPa; P < 0.001), EELV was 1.8 litres larger (95% CI 1.5-2.2 litres; P < 0.001), driving pressure was 6.7 cm H2O lower (95% CI 5.4-7.9 cm H2O; P < 0.001), and regional ventilation was more equally distributed than for PEEP5. After extubation, however, these differences between the arms vanished. Conclusions. In obese patients, an RM and higher PEEPIND restored EELV, regional ventilation distribution, and oxygenation during anaesthesia, but these differences did not persist after extubation. Therefore, lung protection strategies should include the postoperative period. Clinical trial registration. German clinical trials register DRKS00004199, www. who. int/ ictrp/ network/ drks2/ en/.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据