4.5 Article

Influence of low ozone episodes on erythemal UV-B radiation in Austria

期刊

THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY
卷 133, 期 1-2, 页码 319-329

出版社

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00704-017-2170-1

关键词

-

资金

  1. University of Graz
  2. Austrian Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment, and Water Management [BMLFUW-UW.1.4.6/0003-V/4/2009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the influence of low ozone episodes on UV-B radiation in Austria during the period 1999 to 2015. To this aim observations of total column ozone (TCO) in the Greater Alpine Region (Arosa, Switzerland; Hohenpeissenberg, Germany; Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic; Sonnblick, Austria), and erythemal UV-B radiation, available from 12 sites of the Austrian UV-B monitoring network, are analyzed. As previous definitions for low ozone episodes are not particularly suited to investigate effects on UV radiation, a novel threshold approach-considering anomalies-is developed to provide a joint framework for the analysis of extremes. TCO and UV extremes are negatively correlated, although modulating effects of sunshine duration impact the robustness of the statistical relationship. Therefore, information on relative sunshine duration (SDrel), available at (or nearby) UV-B monitoring sites, is included as explanatory variable in the analysis. The joint analysis of anomalies of both UV index (UVI) and total ozone (Delta UVI, Delta TCO) and SDrel across sites shows that more than 65% of observations with strongly negative ozone anomalies (Delta TCO < -1) led to positive UVI anomalies. Considering only days with strongly positive UVI anomaly (Delta UVI > 1), we find (across all sites) that about 90% correspond to negative Delta TCO. The remaining 10% of days occurred during fair weather conditions (SDrel >= 80%) explaining the appearance of Delta UVI > 1 despite positive TCO anomalies. Further, we introduce an anomaly amplification factor (AAF), which quantifies the expected change of the Delta UVI for a given change in Delta TCO.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据