4.5 Article

Relationships between teleconnection patterns and Turkish climatic extremes

期刊

THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY
卷 134, 期 3-4, 页码 1365-1386

出版社

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00704-017-2350-z

关键词

-

资金

  1. BAPKO [FEN-E-120314-0066, FEN-C-YLP-090414-0102, FEN-L-250416-0180, FEN-A-100413-0127, FEN-BGS-120707-0153]
  2. TUBITAK [113R019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This is a study on the effects of teleconnection patterns (TPs) on the extremes of temperature and precipitation over Turkey. Relationships between five teleconnection patterns, North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO), Arctic Oscillation (AO), East Atlantic-Western Russia (EAWR), East Atlantic (EA), and Scandinavian (SCA) patterns, and 11 climate extreme indices were studied by using 94 uniformly distributed meteorological stations over Turkey for the period of 1965-2014. Analyzing strong positive and negative temperature deviations from the 50-year-winter means shows that such extremes can often be explained by using AO and EAWR patterns. During the negative AO, generally more warm days occur over Black Sea (r=-0.6) and Aegean regions (r=-0.7). This phase of AO also generates above-normal precipitation in the western parts of the Anatolian Peninsula (r around -0.5). Winter-time negative AO is mainly associated with the presence of a deepened Genoa cyclone over Italy that can transport warm and moist air mass from Mediterranean Sea towards Turkey by strong westerly winds. In contrast, positive EAWR is mainly connected to cold nights over Black Sea (r=0.6) and Aegean regions (r=0.6) together with positive precipitation anomalies at the seaside stations of the eastern Black Sea region. On the other hand, when positive EAWR prevails, Azores high-pressure center expands towards continental Europe bringing cold air by strong northerly winds together with higher moisture transport from the Black Sea. These results could pave the way for new possibilities regarding the projection of extremes in downscaling techniques.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据