4.5 Article

Managing Internal Supply Chain Integration: Integration Mechanisms and Requirements

期刊

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS LOGISTICS
卷 38, 期 4, 页码 290-309

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jbl.12165

关键词

supply chain integration; internal integration; requisite integration; integration mechanisms; information processing view; qualitative research

资金

  1. Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals
  2. Michigan State University's Center for International Business Education & Research (MSU-CIBER)
  3. Academy of Finland
  4. Fulbright Association
  5. Technology Industries in Finland Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In response to globalization, diversification, and other organizational drivers, managers continue to seek organizational designs that promote integration. We study this phenomenon by focusing on requirements and mechanisms for internal supply chain integration (SCI). Using qualitative interview data, we examine how managers in manufacturing firms integrate internal supply chain activities. We elaborate and extend the information processing view by studying why organizations integrate (integration requirements) and how integration mechanisms are associated with different integration requirements. Four patterns of integration requirement-mechanism linkages emerged from our study, depicting integration mechanisms that are associated with a particular integration requirement, and those that are not. We provide a detailed examination of the multidimensional nature of integration requirements, as well as an increased understanding of how integration mechanisms are used to manage different integration requirements. These findings offer deeper insights into organizational integration, enhancing the understanding of integration in the context of internal supply chains, while also contributing to the literature on organizational design. For supply chain managers, these findings describe ways in which organizational design decisions can support internal SCI efforts with varying aims.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据