3.8 Review

Endoplasmic reticulum, oxidative stress and their complex crosstalk in neurodegeneration: proteostasis, signaling pathways and molecular chaperones

期刊

AIMS MOLECULAR SCIENCE
卷 4, 期 4, 页码 424-444

出版社

AMER INST MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES-AIMS
DOI: 10.3934/molsci.2017.4.424

关键词

Parkinson's Disease; Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis; endoplasmic reticulum; oxidative stress; MAPK; NFkB; autophagy; molecular chaperones

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cellular stress caused by protein misfolding, aggregation and redox imbalance is typical of neurodegenerative disorders such as Parkinson's disease (PD) and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS). Activation of quality control systems, including endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-mediated degradation, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production are initially aimed at restoring homeostasis and preserving cell viability. However, persistent damage to macromolecules causes chronic cellular stress which triggers more extreme responses such as the unfolded protein response (UPR) and non-reversible oxidation of cellular components, eventually leading to inflammation and apoptosis. Cell fate depends on the intensity and duration of stress responses converging on the activation of transcription factors involved in the expression of antioxidant, autophagic and lysosome-related genes, such as erythroid-derived 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) and transcription factor EB respectively. In addition, downstream signaling pathways controlling metabolism, cell survival and inflammatory processes, like mitogen activated protein kinase and nuclear factor-kB, have a key impact on the overall outcome. Molecular chaperones and ER stress modulators play a critical role in protein folding, in the attenuation of UPR and preservation of mitochondrial and lysosomal activity. Therefore, the use of chaperone molecules is an attractive field of investigation for the development of novel therapeutic strategies and disease-modifying drugs in the context of neurodegenerative diseases such as PD and ALS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据