4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Major variations in vitrinite reflectance and consolidation characteristics within a post-middle Miocene forearc basin, central Japan: A geodynamical implication for basin evolution

期刊

TECTONOPHYSICS
卷 710, 期 -, 页码 69-80

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2016.10.027

关键词

Forearc basin; Boso Peninsula; Vitrinite reflectance; Consolidation test; Burial depth; Basin evolution

资金

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17H03304] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Forearc basin sediments near the ocean-ward margin preserve tectonic information related to plate subduction. The post-middle Miocene Boso forearc basin, central Japan, records major differences in structure, paleo-maximum temperature, and consolidation state between below (Miura Group) and above (Kazusa Group) the Kurotaki Unconformity, which formed at ca. 3 Ma. Many fault systems below the unconformity are characterized by a disaggregation-band-like inner fabric that apparently formed soon after sedimentation, whereas there are few of this type of fault system above the unconformity. Vitrinite reflectance values (R-o) are 0.38%-0.44% and 0.22%-0.25% below and above the unconformity, respectively. The consolidation yield stress (pc) in the Miura Group (23.7 MPa in the Anno Formation; 31.0 MPa in the Amatsu Formation) is much greater than that in the Kazusa Group (7.5, 7.6 and 9.6 MPa in the Umegase, Ohtadai and Kiwada formations, respectively). These clear differences in vitrinite reflectance and consolidation characteristics above and below the unconformity are attributed to a forearc basin evolution, which resulted in the Miura Group being geothermally matured, tectonically compacted, uplifted, and eroded (500 m in maximum) before sedimentation of the Kazusa Group. The forearc basin, especially near the trench-slope break, records structural and physical properties reflecting the plate-tectonic environment and the development of the trench-slope. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据