4.7 Article

Colorimetric detection of thiocyanate based on inhibiting the catalytic activity of cystine-capped core-shell Au@Pt nanocatalysts

期刊

TALANTA
卷 175, 期 -, 页码 114-120

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2017.06.005

关键词

Thiocyanate; Core-shell Au@Pt nanoparticles; Peroxidase-like activity; Surface modification

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31371767]
  2. National S & T support program of China [2015BAD17B02]
  3. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province [2015A010105013]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20141108]
  5. National Engineering Research Center for Functional Food, Jiangnan University
  6. Collaborative Innovation Center of Food Safety and Quality Control in Jiangsu Province, Jiangnan University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, core-shell Au@Pt nanocatalysts (Au@Pt NCs) with ultrathin Pt shell were synthesized and demonstrated high peroxidase-like activity. Thiocyanate ions (SCN-) were found to effectively inhibit the peroxidase-like activity of Au@Pt NCs, and the mechanism was discussed by the characterization of TEM, DLS, EPR and XPS, etc. The inhibition of the catalytic activity of Au@Pt NCs by SCN- was mainly due to the decreased ability of the Au@Pt NCs for capturing (OH)-O-center dot radicals and the increased ratio of Pt2+ to Pt-0 on the surface of the Au@Pt NCs. A sensitive calorimetric detection of thiocyanate (SCN-) was developed, based on the activity inhibition of Au@Pt NCs by SCN-. Interestingly, cystine modification of Au@Pt NCs was found to significantly improve the selectivity of SCN- recognition. After optimization, a colorimetric assay for SCN- was established with a detection limit of 5.0 nM and a broad linear calibration over the range of 20 nM to 40 mu M. This assay has the advantages of highly sensitive, selective and low-cost. Moreover, this assay demonstrated highly potential application in the quantitative determination of SCN- in water and raw milk samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据