4.7 Article

A multi-faceted adaptive image fusion algorithm using a multi-wavelet-based matching measure in the PCNN domain

期刊

APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING
卷 61, 期 -, 页码 1113-1124

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2017.02.035

关键词

Image fusion; Multi-faceted adaption; Multi-wavelet; Pulse coupled neural network; Matching measure of pulse number

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61261003]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region of China [2015M50610]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pulse coupled neural network has been applied in image fusion in recent years. In image fusion, determining how to make full use of its characteristics and guarantee the scientific value of the key parameters in the pulse coupled neural network model is particularly important. This paper proposes a novel multi-faceted adaptive image fusion algorithm based on a pulse coupled neural network. This algorithm comprehensively utilizes the advantages of multi-wavelet and pulse coupled neural networks. First, registered original images that need to be fused are decomposed using the multi-wavelet system. Second, pulse couple neural network models of the low- and high-frequency parts are established respectively. The values of several key parameters of pulse coupled neural network model are set in accordance with the information contained in the images to be fused. Third, a new image matching measure, named the pulse number matching measure, is defined. Then, image fusion is performed according to a set of fusion rules, which are constructed based on matching measure of pulse number, and a new image can be obtained after the reconstruction of the multi-wavelet system. The experimental results illustrate that the algorithm can effectively improve the entropy, standard deviation, and quality measure of the fused image. The improvement in performance is demonstrated through detailed theoretical analyses and simulations. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据