4.4 Article

Multi-ecosystem services networks: A new perspective for assessing landscape connectivity and resilience

期刊

ECOLOGICAL COMPLEXITY
卷 32, 期 -, 页码 31-41

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2017.08.004

关键词

Ecosystem services; Spatial network analysis; Landscape connectivity; Ecological resilience

类别

资金

  1. Regional District of Central Okanagan
  2. Okanagan Collaborative Conservation Program
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  4. Canada Graduate Scholarship from NSERC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The sustainability of natural systems is dependent on ecosystem services (ES), the delivery of which would cease without strong connectivity among the ecological processes underlying their production. However, research on the connectivity between multiple ES is in its infancy. Preliminary studies have focused on the flows of individual ES, but research has yet to expand to incorporating the interactions and feedbacks that occur between several different types of ES, and how such complex relationships might influence landscape sustainability. Our objective is to present a viewpoint on how spatial network theory can be used to assess connectivity between multiple ES and landscape ecological resilience. We provide an overview of knowledge and gaps in the literature linking connectivity, networks and ES concepts. We propose a spatial network theory-based approach for the assessment of multi-ES interactions and flows, and present how ecological process flows can be used to develop spatially explicit network nodes and links between multiple ES across landscapes. To illustrate our proposed approach, we provide a design framework and assessment of a simple conceptual multi-ES network. The use of multi-ES networks can help evolve our understanding of landscape connectivity and resilience, and incorporate complex ES relationships into applied planning and management programs. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据