4.5 Article

Assessing the impact of rumen microbial communities on methane emissions and production traits in Holstein cows in a tropical climate

期刊

SYSTEMATIC AND APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
卷 40, 期 8, 页码 492-499

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.syapm.2017.07.008

关键词

Methane emissions; Milk production; Rumen microbiology; Bacteria; Archaea; Fungi

资金

  1. CNPq
  2. CAPES
  3. FAPEMIG
  4. INCT-CA
  5. Embrapa
  6. PECUS-RumenGases
  7. United States Department of Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture [WIS01729]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The evaluation of how the gut microbiota affects both methane emissions and animal production is necessary in order to achieve methane mitigation without production losses. Toward this goal, the aim of this study was to correlate the rumen microbial communities (bacteria, archaea, and fungi) of high (HP), medium (MP), and low milk producing (LP), as well as dry (DC), Holstein dairy cows in an actual tropical production system with methane emissions and animal production traits. Overall, DC cows emitted more methane, followed by MP, HP and LP cows, although HP and LP cow emissions were similar. Using next generation sequencing, it was found that bacteria affiliated with Christensenellaceae, Mogibacteriaceae, S24-7, Butyrivibrio, Schwartzia, and Treponema were negatively correlated with methane emissions and showed positive correlations with digestible dry matter intake (dDMI) and digestible organic matter intake (dOMI). Similar findings were observed for archaea in the genus Methanosphaera. The bacterial groups Coriobacteriaceae, RFP12, and Clostridium were negatively correlated with methane, but did not correlate with dDMI and dOMI. For anaerobic fungal communities, no significant correlations with methane or animal production traits were found. Based on these findings, it is suggested that manipulation of the abundances of these microbial taxa may be useful for modulating methane emissions without negatively affecting animal production. (C) 2017 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据