4.8 Article

Effect on Electrode Work Function by Changing Molecular Geometry of Conjugated Polymer Electrolytes and Application for Hole Transporting Layer of Organic Optoelectronic Devices

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 9, 期 50, 页码 44060-44069

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.7b11164

关键词

organic optoelectronic devices; stability; hole-transporting layer; conjugated polymer electrolytes; molecular dipole

资金

  1. Energy Efficiency & Resources Core Technology Program of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) from the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy, Republic of Korea [20142020103970]
  2. New & Renewable Energy Core Technology Program of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP)
  3. Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy, Republic of Korea [20153010140030]
  4. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [20153010140030] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we synthesized three conjugated polymer electrolytes (CPEs) with different conjugation lengths to control their dipole moments by varying spacers. P-type CPEs (PFT-D, PFtT-D, and PFbT-D) were generated by the facile oxidation of n-type CPEs (PFT, PFtT, and PFbT) and introduced as the hole-transporting layers (HTLs) of organic solar cells (OSCs) and polymer light-emitting diodes (PLEDs). To identify the effect on electrode work function tunability by changing the molecular conformation and arrangement, we simulated density functional theory calculations of these molecules and performed ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy analysis for films of indium tin oxide/CPEs. Additionally, we fabricated OSCs and PLEDs using the CPEs as the HTLs. The stability and performance were enhanced in the optimized devices with PFtT-D CPE HTLs compared to those of PEDOT:PSS HTL-based devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据