4.5 Article

Chemical synthesis and enhanced electrical properties of bulk poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites

期刊

SYNTHETIC METALS
卷 229, 期 -, 页码 65-71

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.synthmet.2017.05.010

关键词

Bulk PEDOT; rGO doping; Thermal treatment; Electrical conductivity

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 program) [2013CB632502]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [51521001]
  3. 111 Project of China [B07040]
  4. CERC-CVC, the U.S.-China Program
  5. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-PI0000012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PEDOT, poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene), is an important conjugated conducting polymer, and a complex salt PEDOT:PSS has been widely researched on account of its advantages of favorable workability, excellent film forming ability and decent electrical conductivity. Although PEDOT films with excellent thermoelectric properties have already been intensively described in the literature, few reports focused on thermoelectric properties of bulk forms of PEDOT. Here, we report on bulk PEDOT and its composites with reduced graphene oxide (PEDOT/rGO) synthesized by a chemical method combined with cold pressing and thermal treatment. The impact of the rGO doping and the thermal treatment on the electrical transport properties of PEDOT and PEDOT/rGO is discussed. The results show that 0.44 wt% of rGO doping improves the electrical conductivity of PEDOT by a factor of about 2. The electrical conductivity of PEDOT/0.44 wt% rGO is further increased by about 3 times after the thermal treatment. Moreover, the power factor of bulk PEDOT is enhanced by a factor of 16 following the thermal treatment. The pi-pi txinteraction between rGO and PEDOT, the closer packing within the polymer matrix, as well as the more ordered structure within the polymer matrix induced by the thermal treatment and the addition of rGO are of crucial importance for the remarkable improvement of the electrical conductivity and the power factor.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据