3.8 Proceedings Paper

Fuel Conversion and CO2 selectivity Improvement by Adding Other Oxygen Carrier for Syngas Chemical Looping Combustor at High Temperature Condition

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1182

关键词

Chemical looping combustion; Fuel conversion; CO2 selectivity; Oxygen carrier

资金

  1. Energy Efficiency & Resources Programs of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) from the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy, Republic of Korea [20152010201840]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chemical-looping combustion (CLC) is a novel combustion technology with inherent separation of the greenhouse gas CO2 and no NOx emission. The chemical-looping combustor consists of two reactors, an oxidation reactor and a reduction reactor. A fuel and an air go through the different reactors. However, fuel conversion and CO2 selectivity in the reduction reactor decreased as the reaction temperature increased within high temperature range (> 900 degrees) due to the increment of exhaust CO concentration from reduction reactor in case of NiO based particle was used as an oxygen carrier in a chemical looping combustion system. To improve reduction reactivity at high temperature range, the applicable metal oxide component was selected by calculation of the equilibrium CO concentrations of metal oxide components at high temperature range. Feasibility of reduction reactivity improvement at high temperature was checked by using solid mixture of the selected metal oxide particle and NiO based oxygen carrier and the reactivity was measured and investigated using batch type fluidized bed. The solid mixture of Co3O4CoAl2O4 (10%) and OCN706-1100 (90%) showed higher fuel conversion, higher CO2 selectivity and lower CO concentration than OCN 706-1100 (100%) case. Consequently, we could conclude that improvement of reduction reactivity at high temperature range by adding some Co3O4 based oxygen carrier is feasible. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据