4.7 Article

Friction and wear behaviors of biodegradable Mg-6Gd-0.5Zn-0.4Zr alloy under simulated body fluid condition

期刊

JOURNAL OF MAGNESIUM AND ALLOYS
卷 5, 期 4, 页码 448-453

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jma.2017.11.002

关键词

Biodegradable Mg alloy; SBF; Friction coefficient; Wear behavior

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province for Outstanding Youth [BK20160081]
  2. Opening Project of Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Advanced Structural Materials and Application Technology [ASMA201503]
  3. Innovative Foundation Project for Students of Nanjing Institute of Technology [TP20170011]
  4. Six Talent Peaks of Jiangsu Province [2015-XCL-025]
  5. Outstanding Scientific and Technological Innovation Team in Colleges and Universities of Jiangsu Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The friction and wear behaviors of biodegradable Mg-6Gd-0.5Zn-0.4Zr (wt%, GZ60K) alloy were evaluated under simulated body fluid (SBF) condition using ball-on-disk configuration and compared with those under dry sliding condition. The results show that under dry sliding and SBF conditions, the friction coefficient declines with increasing applied load and keeps stable with prolonging sliding time. The friction coefficient of the alloy effectively decreases in SBF as compared to dry sliding due to lubrication caused by SBF. The real wear rates under SBF condition are lower than those under dry sliding condition for each parameter. Nevertheless, the nominal wear rates are higher in SBF which are attributed to the more mass loss caused by corrosion but not wear. Both the nominal wear rate in SBF and the dry sliding wear rate increase with increasing applied load, and they decline firstly and then keep stable with prolonging sliding time. It is concluded that the wear of the alloy is restricted by the SBF, but the corrosion of the alloy is aggravated by the wear. (c) 2017 Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Chongqing University. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据