3.8 Proceedings Paper

An automatic miniature surface plasmon resonance system for cortisol detection

期刊

BIOSENSORS 2016
卷 27, 期 -, 页码 89-90

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.protcy.2017.04.038

关键词

surface plasmon resonance (SPR); automatic sample injection; miniature; BSA chip; colloidal gold chip; cortisol

资金

  1. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) [2014AA022303]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2014CB744600]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61571420, 31571007, 61201079, 81371711]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a homemade miniature surface plasmon resonance (SPR) system with automatic sample injection device which is able to work 24 hours unattended. The system with a volume of 48cmx25cmx28cm was constructed with a red laser light source, a P-polarizer, a triangle glass prism, a linear CCD detector, gold sensor chips modified with BSA or colloidal gold, an automatic sample injection device with 20 sample locations. The system sensitivity and noise were tested through detecting different concentration of glycerol solutions with a group of refractive indices (RIs). Cortisol-BSA was fixed on the gold sensor chips modified with BSA or colloidal gold. A series concentration of cortisol (1, 10, 100, 1000 ng/ml) mixed with cortisol-specific monoclonal antibodies were detected by miniature SPR system. The performance of BSA and colloidal gold modified sensor chips were compared by calculating the standard curves and the kinetic curves of the cortisol detection. The results showed that the BSA sensor chip could get a better detection limit of cortisol sample while the colloidal gold sensor chip owed a higher stability and repeatability by regenerating the antibody surface. The research studied the performance of the homemade SPR system and the sensor chips which could be widely used in the protein measurement areas. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据