4.1 Article

Machine-learning Support to Individual Diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment Using Multimodal MRI and Cognitive Assessments

期刊

ALZHEIMER DISEASE & ASSOCIATED DISORDERS
卷 31, 期 4, 页码 278-286

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/WAD.0000000000000208

关键词

machine learning; magnetic resonance imaging; semantics; hippocampus; resting-state

资金

  1. Italian Ministry of Health [42/RF-2010-2321718]
  2. European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7) [601055]
  3. EPSRC [EP/M006328/1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Understanding whether the cognitive profile of a patient indicates mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or performance levels within normality is often a clinical challenge. The use of resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (RS-fMRI) and machine learning may represent valid aids in clinical settings for the identification of MCI patients. Methods: Machine-learning models were computed to test the classificatory accuracy of cognitive, volumetric [structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI)] and blood oxygen level dependentconnectivity (extracted from RS-fMRI) features, in single-modality and mixed classifiers. Results: The best and most significant classifier was the RS-fMRI + Cognitive mixed classifier (94% accuracy), whereas the worst performing was the sMRI classifier (similar to 80%). The mixed global (sMRI+RS-fMRI+Cognitive) had a slightly lower accuracy (similar to 90%), although not statistically different from the mixed RSfMRI+Cognitive classifier. The most important cognitive features were indices of declarative memory and semantic processing. The crucial volumetric feature was the hippocampus. The RS-fMRI features selected by the algorithms were heavily based on the connectivity of mediotemporal, left temporal, and other neocortical regions. Conclusion: Feature selection was profoundly driven by statistical independence. Some features showed no between-group differences, or showed a trend in either direction. This indicates that clinically relevant brain alterations typical of MCI might be subtle and not inferable from group analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据